Making science work

I wanted to kick off with a little bit of idle bloviating. Many folks have noted that academic science is in a bit of a crisis: concerns range from budget woes to postdocpocalypse to big-pharma malfeasance to rank scientific fraud. It seems to me two steps would greatly improve this situation.

First, provide a stable funding mechanism for academic researchers. I see a lot of folks whose science suffers because they spend too much time worrying about the next grant; conversely, I’ve seen several scientists’ labs grow beyond their desire because avoiding collapse often results in accidental and over-exuberant growth.

Second, require pre-registration of experiments. This can be implemented like the new federal (formerly just NIH) public-access policy, in which you must document following this procedure for work paid by government grants, or could go farther by requiring that all federal CVs list only publications with followed the policy. This seems to be the single biggest move for fighting the corporate-sponsor malfeasance, file drawer effect, and the widespread practice of publishing exploratory work as if it were a hypothesis-driven experiment. And it’s cheap and quick. Let’s do it.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s